My mom told me an interesting story recently: She is a retired lawyer - not in medicine - but her anecdote resonated with me:
Years ago, a legal job applicant indicated on his resume that he spoke two languages, in addition to English. Unplanned, the interviewer to whom the candidate was assigned also spoke those languages and proceeded to speak to him in those languages during the interview, only to find that the candidate spoke both poorly at best.
As you can imagine, the applicant was not hired.
I frequently see applicants indicate on their curriculum vitae or their AMCASes that they speak languages fluently. If you do speak a language in addition to English, good for you and great for your candidacy. However, if you indicate that you are fluent, please be ready for your faculty interviewer to conduct your entire medical school interview in that language if s/he pleases.
Monday, February 26, 2018
Monday, February 19, 2018
The Rank Order List Deadline Is Imminently Approaching: Check Yourself Before You Wreck Yourself
This is an important reminder that Wednesday (February 21) at 9am EST is the rank order list certification deadline. I'd recommend submitting today or tomorrow morning to be safe. Waiting until the last minute and making impulsive changes to your list is not a great idea.
Please make sure to avoid simple missteps in creating your rank order list. Improving written materials and interview skills is important, but all of that work can go to waste if applicants do not understand basic strategies for the Match. In November or 2015 the NRMP published an article called, "Understanding the Interview and Ranking Behaviors of Unmatched International Medical Students and Graduates in the 2013 Main Residency Match" in the Journal of Graduate Medical Education. The data is especially important for IMGs who represented the majority of unmatched candidates.
Sadly, the authors found that some applicants made strategic errors including the below:
- Not attending all interviews, thus failing to capitalize on every opportunity to market themselves.
- Declining to rank all programs at which they interviewed or not ranking all programs they would be willing to attend.
- Misunderstanding the Match and ranking programs at which applicants did not interview.
- Failing to rank programs based on true preferences or ranking programs based on the perceived likelihood of matching.
It kills me to read about these mistakes :(. Here is an explanation of the Match algorithm. If you do not understand how the Match works, it is absolutely critical that you learn about it to avoid destructive errors.
Monday, February 12, 2018
Yes, Sleep is a Medical Necessity
I found this short piece, "A Call for Sleep" to be an interesting and honest read. Throughout my life, I've had non medical people tell me that I should be used to a lack of sleep because of my training and night shifts (which I, thankfully, no longer do). If someone has fasted before, that doesn't mean she doesn't get hungry when she doesn't eat!
For applicants, I'll again say that it's critical to consider lifestyle and priorities when choosing a specialty.
For applicants, I'll again say that it's critical to consider lifestyle and priorities when choosing a specialty.
Monday, February 5, 2018
Read the Fine Print
A few years ago, a medical school applicant told me the following story:
This pre-med decided to write follow up notes to all the schools at which he had interviewed, usually a good idea. However, he was upset to receive a brusque note from one of the institutions telling him that a) he should have read their policies; they do not allow post-interview contact and b) he was rejected from the school.
I found the school's note pretty severe, and I strongly suspect the post-interview contact was not related to his rejection. (As an aside, he successfully and happily matriculated at another school.) But this story is a reminder that it's important to read institutions' policies about post-interview contact. Most places welcome written updates, but it's essential to confirm before you send.
This pre-med decided to write follow up notes to all the schools at which he had interviewed, usually a good idea. However, he was upset to receive a brusque note from one of the institutions telling him that a) he should have read their policies; they do not allow post-interview contact and b) he was rejected from the school.
I found the school's note pretty severe, and I strongly suspect the post-interview contact was not related to his rejection. (As an aside, he successfully and happily matriculated at another school.) But this story is a reminder that it's important to read institutions' policies about post-interview contact. Most places welcome written updates, but it's essential to confirm before you send.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)