Letters of Recommendation: Lead the Witness

When pre-meds, medical students, residents, nurses, and physician colleagues asked me to write them letters of recommendation (LORs) when I was Assistant Residency Director, the first thing I requested was that they send me background information to make my letter robust…and my job easier. Accordingly, whether you are applying to medical school, dental school, residency, or fellowship, I strongly recommend you create a “LOR packet,” which can include the following:

1. A brief, well-written cover letter defining all of your important accomplishments
2. Your curriculum vitae (CV)
3. Your personal statement in its final form and/or
4. Your transcripts.

With regard to the cover letter, keep it streamlined: Thank the writer and highlight your pre-professional achievements on one page. The point of the cover letter is to supplement a writer’s knowledge of your candidacy and offer flattering content for inclusion. A college professor may know  you made the only A in an organic chemistry class, but her LOR for medical school will be more complete, and she will demonstrate a more intimate familiarity with you if she knows enough to write that you volunteer regularly at a homeless shelter.

With regard to the CV and personal statement, these make useful supplements to the LOR packet only if they are in professional and final form. Don’t include rough drafts. Poorly organized background information leaves your writer with the impression that you are a disorganized person. Also, only include the transcript if it bolsters your candidacy, demonstrating academic achievement. Don’t shoot yourself in the foot if you have some bad grades you’d rather not showcase.

Bottom line: An applicant who offered me a list of her accomplishments in a tidy, accessible package was more likely to get a strong, comprehensive letter that was submitted promptly. She also distinguished herself from the majority of candidates who requested letters without demonstrating a comparably sophisticated understanding of the demands this process made on my time. If you can make a letter writer's job easier, your forethought is likely to pay dividends in the letter you receive. The savvy applicant can take subtle advantage of her ability to "lead the witness."

Match Results 2023: Why Did Emergency Medicine Do So Badly?

Emergency medicine has had its ups and downs over the years with regard to desirability. Soon after the show "ER" became popular, emergency medicine programs also were suddenly in vogue. Over the interim years, the field's cachet has declined and increased, but up until recent years, emergency medicine programs routinely filled 99% of their available spots in the Match.

The fact that 554 emergency spots went unfilled in this past Match was particularly distasteful to many emergency physicians, accordingly.

The reasons for this plummeting interest in the field is well described in a recent piece in ACEP Now. (ACEP stands for the American College of Emergency Physicians.) The authors note multiple issues, including burnout, decreasing remuneration, and systemic problems in the emergency healthcare system that frustrate clinicians. 

Of note, these issues have driven out many middle-aged emergency physicians, as well.

Even if you are not interested in becoming an emergency doctor, take a look at the piece here, keeping in mind that certain factors may soon adversely affect other specialties as well.

(I'd like to give a shout out to my old friend Jonathan Fisher MD MPH who was one of the reporters on this article.) 

Changes in the AMCAS

Premeds applying this cycle will notice a few changes to the AMCAS. There are no drastic modifications, so don't worry, but it's worth knowing what to expect.

Back in 2012, an important, new addition appeared on the AMCAS: Applicants were being asked to identify their most significant extracurricular experiences (up to three) and support their choices with more writing. Now the Most Meaningful Paragraphs are par for the course, but the change was a big surprise back then.

This year the updates are comparatively minor. One difference is the Other Impactful Experiences section. It is not an addition, however. It replaces the Disadvantaged Status section, allowing for a broader understanding of challenges that can adversely affect an applicant's life and candidacy.

To their credit, the AAMC also changed the "other" pronoun and gender identity categories to "another pronoun set" and  "another gender identity."

Please see this short article from the AAMC regarding other changes in this year's AMCAS.

BS/MD Programs

Here is an AAMC piece about BS/MD programs. While these curricula do provide some benefits to students with an early interest in medicine, I am generally not a proponent of the BS/MD option, as it really precludes most participants' ability to take full advantage of the college experience; the caveat may be 8-year programs (like Brown or Tufts) that don't accelerate students, as much as give them early assurance of admission to medical school (assuming individuals maintain their grades). 

My bias is that taking more time - for example, a gap year - is a way to enjoy the school experience and approach medical training with maturity and career choice confidence.